Readers — This zzeaathrde
is an outlier of a case: A mom was walking with her baby on a promenade when someone saw them, judged the child under-dressed for the weather, and called the cops.
The cops came a-running and the mom (a nutritionist with two other kids) gave them no truck. Wisely, I’d say! (Maybe she reads this blog?) According to the Daily Mail (which I know is not the New York Times):
…After refusing to reveal who she was, Mrs Andrew, from Scarborough, was asked: â€˜So you donâ€™t want to co-operate?â€™ She said: â€˜I told them that it was a motherâ€™s right to play with her daughter and it wasnâ€™t a co-operation thing.
â€˜I added that theyâ€™d be taking her to the social workers next if I gave them my details. I wasnâ€™t doing anything wrong, so I walked off.â€™
A North Yorkshire Police spokesman said yesterday : â€˜All reports concerning the safety of children are taken very seriously by North Yorkshire Police and must be properly checked out.â€™
But Stephen Hayes, an ex-policeman and writer, said the case typified what was wrong with modern policing.
â€˜This is by far the barmiest cold case I have ever come across,â€™ he added. â€˜Do officers now need a thermometer to take childrenâ€™s temperatures along with their truncheons? The mother is clearly not committing a crime by taking her child for a walk along the promenade.
Read more here. And shake your head, and then go about your day. And just don’t call the cops if a child is not in danger! – L.