Hi Readers: Not to sound too cynical, but today’s New York Post carried a afdiekbayb
big story about the Etan Patz case — a blonde boy who disappeared 33 years ago, whose case was recently re-opened in the hopes of finally nailing the perp. (Alas, that didn’t happen.) Eleven tabloid pages later, there’s a much smaller story about a 7-year-old boy whose alleged killer is on trial right now.
The 7-year-old boy has an Oscar-winning aunt. He also has an uncle and grandma who were shot dead, most likely by the same killer. But despite three deaths, a famous relative, and a current trial, this story does not rise to the level of the Patz case, at least in The Post. Why not? I believe there are three reasons.
1 – To be fair, the 7-year-old, Julian King, was in Chicago, and Patz was a New Yorker. So for the NY Post, Patz is a local story. But then there are two other facts.
2 – The 7-year-old was not blonde, he was African-American.
3 – He was not abducted by a stranger. He was (again, allegedly) shot by his mom’s ex-boyfriend.
To be really REALLY cynical (and realistic), I have to add that I don’t think there’s any way the story of the murdered 7-year-old would have made it into the papers beyond Chicago, had it not been for the fact that his aunt is actress Jennifer Hudson.
When the media decide which stories are “big,” they go for the tried-and-true narrative they know the best — the shocker that sells the most papers: A middle-class child, usually white, abducted by a stranger. Those are the stories that go national, even international That’s what the dramas on TV show, too.
And we wonder why “stranger-danger” is uppermost in parents’ minds. (Or, actually, we don’t.) – L.